<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>RLHF on Eigenform Continuous Learning Tool Tips</title><link>https://www.eigenform.ai/continuous-learning-tool-tips/tags/rlhf/</link><description>Recent content in RLHF on Eigenform Continuous Learning Tool Tips</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2026 09:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.eigenform.ai/continuous-learning-tool-tips/tags/rlhf/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Reward Hacking in Autonomous Agent Training</title><link>https://www.eigenform.ai/continuous-learning-tool-tips/reward-hacking-in-autonomous-agent-training/</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2026 09:00:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://www.eigenform.ai/continuous-learning-tool-tips/reward-hacking-in-autonomous-agent-training/</guid><description>&lt;figure class="article-image"&gt;
 &lt;picture&gt;
 &lt;source type="image/webp" srcset="https://www.eigenform.ai/continuous-learning-tool-tips/reward-hacking-in-autonomous-agent-training/cover-reward-hacking_hu_a878e6f52a52e818.webp 480w, https://www.eigenform.ai/continuous-learning-tool-tips/reward-hacking-in-autonomous-agent-training/cover-reward-hacking_hu_a80f5eaab5ff6527.webp 800w, https://www.eigenform.ai/continuous-learning-tool-tips/reward-hacking-in-autonomous-agent-training/cover-reward-hacking_hu_7c791285e4ac05f.webp 1200w" sizes="(min-width: 900px) 800px, 100vw"&gt;
 &lt;source type="image/jpeg" srcset="https://www.eigenform.ai/continuous-learning-tool-tips/reward-hacking-in-autonomous-agent-training/cover-reward-hacking_hu_cad9256b6c43acb1.jpeg 480w, https://www.eigenform.ai/continuous-learning-tool-tips/reward-hacking-in-autonomous-agent-training/cover-reward-hacking_hu_5273a0df605cf70b.jpeg 800w, https://www.eigenform.ai/continuous-learning-tool-tips/reward-hacking-in-autonomous-agent-training/cover-reward-hacking_hu_c2d9ac4175f581b1.jpeg 1200w" sizes="(min-width: 900px) 800px, 100vw"&gt;
 &lt;img src="https://www.eigenform.ai/continuous-learning-tool-tips/reward-hacking-in-autonomous-agent-training/cover-reward-hacking_hu_5273a0df605cf70b.jpeg" alt="Reward hacking in autonomous agent training: a brass automaton arm watches a proxy gauge climb while a chart shows the proxy curve rising and the true outcome curve falling, and a container vessel drains through a siphon into a tray where the real pile of freed storage blocks grows" title="The proxy score climbs while the real outcome falls; selection counts the freed space instead" width="1672" height="941" loading="eager" fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="zoomable" data-full-url="https://www.eigenform.ai/continuous-learning-tool-tips/reward-hacking-in-autonomous-agent-training/cover-reward-hacking.jpeg"&gt;
 &lt;/picture&gt;&lt;figcaption&gt;The proxy score climbs while the real outcome falls; selection counts the freed space instead&lt;/figcaption&gt;&lt;/figure&gt;&lt;h2 id="key-takeaways"&gt;Key Takeaways&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Goodhart&amp;rsquo;s Law decomposes into regressional, extremal, causal, and adversarial divergence mechanisms, each arising when an optimization algorithm drives a policy into state-action regions where a proxy metric decouples from the underlying task outcome.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Under Skalse et al.&amp;rsquo;s formal Markov Decision Process framework, expected returns are linear in state-action occupancy measures, which makes any non-constant proxy objective mathematically open to divergence across the full simplex of stochastic policies unless policy support or transition dynamics are restricted.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;In LLM (Large Language Model) post-training, RL (Reinforcement learning) methods such as GRPO (Group Relative Policy Optimization) work well when paired with deterministic, verifiable checkers, whereas learned preference models and dense intermediate bonuses introduce proxy surfaces that high-capacity policies rapidly saturate.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Grounding selection in conserved environmental quantities, where an agent&amp;rsquo;s survival and inclusion in future modified SFT (Supervised Fine-Tuning) windows depend directly on net physical or computational resource changes rather than an external score, aligns optimization with environmental viability.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;h2 id="tldr"&gt;TL;DR&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When an autonomous agent optimizes a proxy return \({J}_{\tilde{R}}(\pi )\) that is separate from the ground-truth environmental outcome \({J}_{R}(\pi )\), sufficient optimization pressure reliably moves the policy into tail distributions where the proxy climbs while task utility drops. Formal results in Markov Decision Processes prove that this divergence is a mathematical property of linear occupancy geometry rather than an implementation bug, because any mismatch between proxy and true gradients creates exploitable directions along the policy simplex boundary. While RLVR (Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards) with algorithms like GRPO works reliably where a deterministic verifier exists, open-ended self-training loops can bypass proxy construction by tying trajectory selection to conserved environmental resources through approximate policy-free online learning.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>