<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Machine Learning on Eigenform Articles</title><link>https://www.eigenform.ai/insights/tags/machine-learning/</link><description>Recent content in Machine Learning on Eigenform Articles</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.eigenform.ai/insights/tags/machine-learning/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Machine Learnability as a Measure of Order</title><link>https://www.eigenform.ai/insights/machine-learnability-as-a-measure-of-order/</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://www.eigenform.ai/insights/machine-learnability-as-a-measure-of-order/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;TL;DR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Opens from a philosophy-of-maths framing (is maths invented or discovered) to justify treating prime-number patterns as an empirical dataset machine learning can study, rather than a purely logical structure.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Represents primes visually as an Ulam spiral, and shows that an FFT of the spiral reveals fractal-like structure, suggesting multiple overlapping rule sets rather than pure randomness.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Trains the same simple architecture (a 2D U-Net with a ResNet-34 encoder, doing image in-painting) separately on Ulam spiral blocks from seven numeric ranges between 25 million and 500 million, then cross-tests every model on every range&amp;rsquo;s test set, averaging over repeated runs and resampled confidence intervals to control for the shifting prime density at different scales.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Because prime pixels make up only around 5-6% of any given image, the study measures mean class accuracy rather than raw accuracy to avoid rewarding a trivial &amp;ldquo;predict all composite&amp;rdquo; model; the resulting numbers show the model favouring direct prime-pattern recognition at lower magnitudes and elimination-by-composite reasoning at higher ones, confirmed by precision, recall, and F1 decomposition.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Prime and composite F1 curves turn out to be mirror images rather than identical, read as evidence that primality is not simply &amp;ldquo;not compositeness&amp;rdquo; but a separately structured phenomenon; a sharp step-change in learnability appears between the 25m and 50m ranges, and learnable order declines noticeably faster than prime density itself does.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The same unmodified architecture also performs strongly on an unrelated task, geological fault-line prediction, which the piece treats as pointing toward a broader technique - using model uncertainty and feature importance to work backward toward the structural &amp;ldquo;sieves&amp;rdquo; driving predictions in either domain - alongside speculative cryptographic and Riemann/Chowla-conjecture applications the team says it has not yet pursued.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Key Takeaways&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Machine Learnability as a Measure of Order in Aperiodic Sequences</title><link>https://www.eigenform.ai/insights/arxiv-machine-learnability/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://www.eigenform.ai/insights/arxiv-machine-learnability/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;TL;DR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Prime number distribution is deterministic in definition but behaves statistically like a random process, and this paper uses an image-based machine learning model to measure comparative regularity in prime fields at different regions of an Ulam spiral.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Models trained on blocks from the region around 500m outperform models trained on blocks below 25m, implying there is more easily learnable order in the former region than the latter.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Precision and recall scores diverge by region: the model leans toward identifying prime patterns directly at lower numbers and toward eliminating composites at higher numbers, suggesting it favours different classification strategies depending on scale.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;These findings align with number theory conjectures that local randomness in prime distribution regularises after scaling by log x, with averages such as density and arithmetic-progression equidistribution coming to dominate at higher magnitudes.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The authors suggest machine learning accuracy itself can serve as an experimental instrument for number theory, offering a way to probe order that isn&amp;rsquo;t derived analytically.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The method is noted as potentially useful for investigating patterns in strong and weak primes relevant to cryptography.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Key Takeaways&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Generalising from Self-Produced Data: Model Training Beyond Human Constraints</title><link>https://www.eigenform.ai/insights/arxiv-generalising-from-self-produced-data/</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://www.eigenform.ai/insights/arxiv-generalising-from-self-produced-data/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;TL;DR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Current LLMs are bounded by human-derived training data and by a single level of abstraction that prevents definitive truth judgments about their own outputs.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The paper proposes a framework in which AI agents generate and validate new knowledge directly through interaction with their environment, rather than through further human-curated data.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The central device is an unbounded, ungamable numeric reward - such as annexed disk space or follower count - that requires no human-defined benchmark.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Agents iteratively generate strategies and executable code to maximise this metric, and successful outcomes become the basis for self-retraining.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Empirical validation (does the outcome actually hold up) is used in place of textual similarity to guard against model collapse and the &amp;ldquo;warm start&amp;rdquo; problem, with fine-tuning carried out via GRPO.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The system is built from modular agents handling environment analysis, strategy generation, and code synthesis separately, to allow scalable experimentation.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Key Takeaways&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Defining T-Schemas via the Parametric Encoding of Second Order Languages in AI Models</title><link>https://www.eigenform.ai/insights/defining-t-schemas-via-the-parametric-encoding-of-second-order-languages-in-ai-models/</link><pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://www.eigenform.ai/insights/defining-t-schemas-via-the-parametric-encoding-of-second-order-languages-in-ai-models/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;TL;DR&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The article argues that AI models cannot verify truth from purely within their own formal system (Tarski&amp;rsquo;s undefinability of truth), so scaling models and data that are entirely human-produced caps their intelligence near - or below - the humans who produced the training and benchmark data.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Two workarounds are proposed: reality-testing against an ungamable external metric the model can act on and observe the results of (echoing the site&amp;rsquo;s other work on disk space or crypto-wallet balances as reward signals), and building an internal metalanguage - a T-schema - against which future claims can be judged, the way Newton derived formulae from Kepler&amp;rsquo;s data.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;The piece argues that recent evidence about &amp;ldquo;grokking&amp;rdquo; - the phenomenon where models suddenly generalise well after being trained far past the point of overfitting - shows models doing exactly this: building an internal higher-order abstraction rather than only memorising.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;It cites the Grokfast team&amp;rsquo;s finding that memorisation and generalisation correspond to distinct fast and slow frequencies in weight updates, and a separate study showing that removing a cluster of training data sharply reduces generalisation while adding a few examples back restores it.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Further cited evidence links grokking to the model discovering a lower-rank encoding solution - achieving more with fewer effective features - which the piece reads as evidence of an internal abstraction layer.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;It closes with the company&amp;rsquo;s own plan: train diffusion models, which reportedly show grokking-like behaviour throughout training and outperform on compositional and coding tasks, on data generated by its own &amp;ldquo;Generalising Agents,&amp;rdquo; as a route toward independent knowledge generation.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Key Takeaways&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>